This assignment calls for a short, (mostly)
exigetical essay.
Answer one of the following
questions:
What is Williamson's argument (in §7.2 of Vagueness)
against denials of bivalence? What sort of response to this argument
is the introduction of "weak negation" supposed to provide? What does
Williamson find wrong with the response?
What is Williamson's point in discussing "omnicsient
speakers" in §7.3 of Vagueness—what claim is
being argued for here? How does the argument go? Is it
successful? Why or why not?