| | | | |
| | | |
| 3.3. |
Computer simulations in pest management |
| | 3.3.1. |
Assumptions and oversimplifications |
| | | 3.3.1.1. |
General goal is to construct as simple a
model as possible to meet the objectives
established at the outset |
| | | 3.3.1.2. |
Structure (coarse adjustment) |
| | | |
- Aggregation of like elements that behave similarly (generalization)
-- e.g., a highly aggregated pest
management model might have a single
component to represent "insect" rather
than a separate component for each
species or each population
- The level of resolution is selected to include only as much detail as is
necessary
- Simple curve fitting is often adequate for prediction
(e.g. prediction of yields), but rational modeling using logical
deductions from a set of premises is necessary for mechanistic models
|
| | | 3.3.1.3. |
Parameterization (fine tuning) |
| | | |
- Simply guess at values (so state in
model documentation)
- Obtain values from literature data
- Conduct carefully controlled experiments to estimate
parameters precisely
|
| | 3.3.2. |
How computer simulations are used in pest
management |
| | | 3.3.2.1. |
Training |
| | | |
- Gives novices experience in management
decision-making without risk of
disastrous consequences
- Compresses several seasons into a few
minutes or hours -- student can experience
a wide range of conditions
|
| | | 3.3.2.2. |
Research |
| | | |
- Already mentioned -- organizing a research
program and establishing priorities
- Conduct experiments that are not
possible in the real system
(e.g., large factorial experiments can be
simulated in order to later zero
in on treatments to test in the field)
- Use simulations to develop pest management strategies or to create
decision-making models for
growers, extension agents, pest
management consultants
|
| | | 3.3.2.3. |
Extension |
| | | |
Modeling can complement monitoring
|