|
Lecture
30: Cosmology II: The Fate of the Universe
|
| Astronomy
101/103 |
Terry
Herter, Cornell University
|
|

Lecture
Topics
|
- The
Evolution of the Universe
- The
Critical Density
- The
Age of the Universe
- The
Cosmological Constant
- The
Accelerating Universe
|
|

Universe's
Fate?
|
- Looking
at the evolution of the universe similar to escaping
from a planet.
|
|

Evolution of the
Universe
|
- Possible
"histories" of the universe
|
|

Critical Density
|
- Will
the universe keep expanding forever or stop expanding
and collapse?
- If
the mass density is:
- large
eventual collapse (bound)
- small
expansion forever (unbound)
- The
critical density is the dividing line between
the bound and unbound cases.
- For
H0 = 75 km/sec/Mpc
- critical
density ~ 10-29 g/cm3, or
about 6 H-atoms/m3
- This
corresponds to 1 MW galaxy/Mpc3
- Define
WM as the ratio
of the actual density to the critical density
- Sometimes
this will simply be called W.
|
|

WM
and Ho
|
|
WM
|
Age
|
Comment |
|
0
|
1/H0
|
Empty
Universe |
|
1
|
(2/3)x(1/H0)
|
Critical
Universe |
|
- We've
already discussed H0.
- But
what is omega? (numerically)
|
|

Age of the Universe
(again)
|
|

Measuring
WM
|
Two
ways to determine WM
are:
- Galaxy
Counts -
- Directly
measure amount of mass in the universe.
- Deceleration
of the Universe -
- Measure
how much faster galaxies were moving in the past.
|
|

Galaxy Counts
|
- Counting
galaxies and adding up their mass yields WM
~ 0.045.
- But...
This misses most of the mass.
- Masses
can be found from (gravity):
- the
motions of stars in galaxies
- the
motions of galaxies in clusters
- Gravity
implies much more mass than we see in stars/galaxies dark
matter.
- We
can't "see" > 90% of the mass in the universe, except
by gravity!
- Possible
presence of:
- MACHOs
(Massive Compact Halo Objects)?
- WIMPs
(Weakly Interacting Massive Particles)?
- Correcting
for the missing mass due to dark matter gives WM
~ 0.35.
|
|

Deceleration of the Universe
|
- We
need a "standard candle" to measure distances and recessional
velocities independently.
- It
is difficult to find a standard candle.
- Galaxies
were different in the past
- Type
Ia Supernovae now appear to work very well. (Caused by
accretion onto a white dwarf.)
|
|

A Funny Thing
Happened ...
|
- Type
Ia SN results indicate that the universe is accelerating!
- Acceleration
=> the expansion rate is increasing
- Contrary
to our initial bias the it should be decelerating
- Deceleration
=> the expansion rate is slowing
|
|

The
Cosmological
Constant
|
|
The
Cosmological Constant (L)
- Introduced
by Einstein into General Relativity
- Thought
the universe was static
- Can
be repulsive or attactive
- Called
it his biggest mistake
- But
now we may need it!
- This
is not the only way to handle this problem, but you still
need a repulsive force to explain the acceleration of
the universe.
- A
fifth force dubbed "Quintessence" has been postulated.
|
|

The Three
Omegas
|
- Besides
H0 we need three more parameters to determine
the evolution of the universe
- WM,
WL,
and Wk as
- WM,
is defined as before
- WL
defines the Cosmological Constant part
- Wk
defines the geometry of the universe (more later)
- However,
Wk can be written
in terms of the other two so we really only need two
Omegas
- Will
the universe keep expanding forever or stop expanding
and collapse?
|
|

The Two
Omegas
|
- So
now we only need to know WM
and WL.
- With
no (zero) cosmological constant
- Have
WM and Wk
with Wk
= 1 - WM
- With
a non-zero cosmological constant
- Have
WM, WL,
and Wk with
Wk = 1 -
WM - WL
- These
determine the dynamics and geometry of the Universe
- WM
and WL
set acceleration/deceleration
- Wk
sets the geometry
|
|

Accelerating
Universe
|
|
- The
expansion velocity in the past depends upon WM
and WL.
- Galaxies
would be moving faster in the past for a non-empty universe.
|
|

Type Ia SN
Results
|
- Observations
of the distance modulus (m-M) for Type Ia supernovae
and WMAP (Microwave Anisotropy Probe)
seem to be best fit with
- WM
= 0.27 and WL
= 0.73 (and from Hubble measurements H0 =
71 km/sec/Mpc)
- Good
spectroscopic data exists only for supernovae at z <
1.
- Infrared
observations of the light curve of a more distant supernova
in the Hubble Deep field show agreement with the above
Omegas.
- These
latter measurements do not have detailed spectroscopy
because the source was too faint, so they are more
uncertain.
|
|
|
|