Swatch Watches

1983-present

Swatches, no not fabric samples, but Swatch Watches, a flash back from the eighties, right? Well they are still around today, but they have a significantly different value. They once were a teenage craze. A mass commodity that was not too pricy and could be found in every location, from discount stores, to department stores, to specialty stores. Consumers bought them in droves and wore not one, but two, three, or four, and in their hair, and on their clothes. They had one to match every outfit.

They were mass produced commodities and the Swiss made a mint off them.They did not represent a time or a place, as of yet. They were simply the new watch obsession.
James Clifford, author of "On Collecting Art and Culture,"1 would have located 80s Swatches as inauthentic, non-art, on his masterpiece vs. artifact and authentic vs. inauthentic chart:


They were like any other fad fashion, such as hot pink spandex, only to be around a short while. Though, somewhere along this downward plummet from the heights of popularity to depths of disregard, Swatches outlasted their era and moved from non-art, inauthentic, to the authentic culture, a phenomenon Clifford does not often see, but his work does help to explain it. Swatch, Inc. did motivated this move through their post-'84 marketing strategies and their later counter-strategies, as well as those of the collectors, to encourage the new Swatch culture of collection, not fashion, in the '90s.
The Swatch was the savior of the Swiss watch industry. The mid 1970s were grim years for the Swiss. The Japanese had captured the market with their introduction of the digital 'Delirium,' (photo left) a watch with the worlds thinnest wrist band and the least number of components. In response to the crisis the Swiss founded the Corporation for Microelectronics and Watchmaking Industries, SMH. And what was the result? You guessed it, the Swatch. It was a high quality, slim, plastic watch, with only 51 components(refer to picture at right), at a low price.
Introduced to the market in 1983, it is the most successful wrist watch of all time, with 250 million units sold to date, not only on the 80s.
As with punk rock, leg warmers from Flash Dance, charm necklaces, jelly bracelets up and down both arms, neon colors, and......the swatch watch was a relic of the 80s. They defined an age, but what caused the Swatch to forge ahead into the 90s leaving the others in the dust? One reason was the popularity of the swatch which created a new definition for the need for a watch. Before the mid-eighties it had been an accepted fact that people needed and wanted only one watch, or two at the most - one for dress and one for casual - so watch manufactures centered their promotions around accuracy, and size, or weight. Consumers were not going to be buying new watches everyday. Purchasing a good watch was like purchasing a car, you only need to do it every so often, so manufactures had to net a large profit on each watch, rather than sell a lot at a small profit.
As time past and technology increased the difference in accuracy and size between bottom line watches and top line watches decreased to the point where the value in the difference no longer mattered for the consumer. None the less, Swiss watch manufactures still tried to prevent the news from coming out. They, however, were unsuccessful, and Japanese digital watch manufacturers cleaned up at the marketplace, meaning a wave good bye to the Swiss.
Then came the Swatch, whoosh, and the market turned around. The digital style was out, at least for a while. Now it was time for the Swiss to shine again. They started out as simple and plain "color-block" watches (refer to ad above at left) and then gradually went wild in order to fully   encapsulate the market      .


Swatches were decorated with anything from blue pasta:








to Keith Haring originals:
               
               

It was here, these marketing strategies employed, that guaranteed the success of the Swatch well into the future. The Swatch was no longer at the same level as the Japanese digital watch. It had moved beyond to become "rare period pieces and thus collectibles (old green glass coke bottles)," as said by Clifford.1
Today, swatches are not available at every store and are quite pricy. In fact you have to search to find them, especially if you have a particular one in mind. This is due to more than one factor including: the artistic design of the Swatch watches, new Innovations, marketing strategies, and strategic distributions systems set up by Swatch Inc. Swatch capitalized on the idea of product line extensions and variations like no other company has. Swatch, Inc. knew that in order to keep its interest up beyond the 80s craze it had to make some changes.
The artistic design of the watch was a key factor in its success. Initially "the swatch" was designed with simple color blocks (see "Time for fashion! Time for Swatch!" ad above). As the idea of different color blocks for different occasions took on, i.e. owing more than one watch, Swatch realized that if they varied the design even greater, then current consumers would certainly increase their 'collection,' and new customers would be attracted (hopefully) by the new product extensions.


Right from the decision to increase variation, Swatch looked art for inspiration,though the artists themselves, as of yet, were not actually asked to put their name on the creations. Swatch used influences from the pop generation (refer to Swatch above), the renaissance, celestial works (refer to Swatch directly below) , oriental influences (refer to Swatch below the Swatch directly below) and such art works such as David.


This trend started in 1984 and continued in all of the  forms of the swatch from the pop swatch (refer to   Swatches at left) to the scuba swatch to the maxi swatch.


The first year of the Swatch, 1983, was really a tough one for Swatch. It was not until 1984 that Swatch coordinated the Swatch look with the correct marketing style (refer to ad below at left), but once that occurred Swatches were flying off the shelves:



                                                 
 
To further capitalize on the success of the art inspired swatches, Swatch, Inc. made a full commitment and asked a range of artists to design one to four watches. These artists included:
Valerio Adami Pierre Alechinski
Pol Bury
Jean Michel Folon
Sam Francis
Massimo Giacon
Keith Haring
Alfred Hofkunst
Alessandro Mendini
Mimmo Paladino
Kiki Picasso
Matteo Thun
Niklaus Troxler
Felice Varini
Not VitalT
Tadanori Yokoo
These designer watches are today the ones driving the collector market. They go for the most and are the most widely and extensively searched for (not an easy task).
Along with the fact that certain Swatches were designed by great Artists, such as Keith Haring, going through such extraordinary life situations (a gay life style and dying of AIDS), there were other reasons for swatches move from a daily commodity to a collectable cultural art and they have to do with aspects that Swatch, Inc. can.
Swatch was not going to make it easy for collectors to get a hold of complete lines or collections. If the collectors wanted the full collection they could potentially order it direct form Switzerland, a complicated task, or search out every swatch outlet for a list of their inventory. Swatch sends each store Swatches on its own prerogative. Stores are not allowed to ask for certain styles. They have to take what they are given. Also Swatch runs only a certain number of each design, only 100-300 for the entire world. This is why if you look on the web certain styles go for ten to twenty times their originally intended price, but if you just have to have it then you are willing to pay.
Some would say that "the Swatch" has lost its way. Its initial intention was to be a functional, extremely accurate, competitively priced, every-day type watch. Today, it is viewed as a high priced collectors item never to be warn. I would not say that it has lost its way, but rather that it has found its way to years of success. Fads and fashions die, but symbols of authentic culture live on, valuable, forever. Swatch was able to move its plastic creation from the realm of the mass commodity to that of culture. The swatch is no longer looked at as an 80s thing but as a valuable work of the modern world and of the art culture itself.

The movement of the swatch from the inauthentic to the authentic, mapped out by Clifford, and its win over the Japanese Digital watch sheds some light on the existing complex relationship between producers and consumers. If the producers were in full control of our buying habits, then the Japanese digital watch would have won hands down. The Japanese watches were cheaper and worked just as well. However, the system does not work that way. We pick and choose, at the same time producers try to persuade us to buy their products. Consumer add their own social value to the Swatch, one of the main reasons people start collecting them in the first place.
One collector started her collection because of an experience with her first Swatch:


Six years ago, this is an interesting story, I lost my original Swatch at the beach. But come next spring I found it again, still intact, and still ticking away. I was so impressed that I had to start collecting.


"In the West...collecting has long been a strategy for the deployment of a possessive self, culture, and authenticity," as said by Clifford.1 The collecting of the Swatch was the final step that made it truly authentic. Swatch Watch, Inc., may have done everything in its power to push Swatch owners to the point of collection, but they could never force them. Swatch collectors did it on their own. They added their own value to the Swatch:


I collect them as memory reminders. One I picked up in St. Thomas and now when I look at it now it reminds me of the trip and the fun time I had.
Some collectors, though, are using the value the authentic collectors have created for their Swatches to their monetary advantage:
It is definitely for sentimental reasons, and as I said above it developed from a personal experience.
They are only in it for the money. This detracts from the authenticity, but it is unavoidable. After all, Western 'possessive individualism,' analyzed by C.B Macpherson (1962), "traces the seventeenth-century emergence of an ideal self as owner: the individual surrounded by accumulated property and goods."1We define ourselves by our collections, whether they are formally displayed, heaped around, or used every day, we make the final choice of what to obtain and retain. The producers only have a small part. They may start the ball rolling, but the individual decides the speed, size, path, and momentum.

The Swatch Man himself!

The co-founder, Chairman of the

Board of Directors and Chief

Executive Office of SMH, with

headquarter in Biel, Switzerland.



1. James Clifford. "On Collecting Art and Culture," from The Predicament of Culture (Harvard University Press, 1988) p49-73.